Atomic Business Advisers
a
Updated: 11 March 2026

Small Fish are Sweet: TCs Third Rule of Business

Small Fish are Sweet – TCs Third Rule of Business | TCs 2Cents

Important

If you think landing one big national or multinational contract will change everything, this might change your mind. I have seen profitable Australian businesses nearly crippled because they chased size over stability.

Small Fish Are Sweet: Why “The Big One” Can Break a Profitable SME

If you think landing one big national or multinational contract will change everything, this might change your mind.

I have seen profitable Australian businesses nearly crippled because they chased size over stability.

Not because they were bad business-people.

Because they got dazzled by the bright lights, said yes too quickly, and took on a client or project well outside their hitting zone.

That is why TCs Rule of Business #3 exists:

Small fish are sweet.

This is not a rule about staying small.

It is a rule about growing without snapping your systems, your cash flow, and your reputation.

Rule #3: Small fish are sweet

I am big on growth.

I truly believe that if we are not moving forward, we are going backwards.

But there is a difference between:

  • controlled growth, and
  • growth that breaks the business.

The goal is not “bigger”.

The goal is better, then bigger.

Because “bigger” too early can create a mess that takes 12–24 months to fix.

Sometimes the business never fully recovers.

The trap: getting dazzled by the bright lights

SMEs get tempted by:

  • large national clients
  • multinational clients
  • high-profile projects
  • “big brand” work that looks great on the website

It feels like levelling up.

But what changes is not just the invoice.

The requirements jump fast, including:

  • higher service levels (instant responses, constant access)
  • faster turnaround
  • heavier reporting and documentation
  • “no mistakes” expectations

In plain terms: it is not just more work.

It is a different operating environment.

The blunt warning: I have seen this go bad

I have seen this pattern too many times:

  • a profitable SME, operating well in its lane
  • strong margins, good rhythm, happy clients
  • then they take a project outside their hitting zone

Outcome: financial damage + reputational damage.

When it goes wrong, it is rarely a quick fix.

  • Recovery can take 12 months to two years
  • Team morale gets smashed
  • Existing clients feel neglected
  • Quality slips under pressure
  • Reputation takes a hit that spreads

One big client can do more damage than good.

Why relying on “the big one” increases risk

A big client can feel like security.

In practice, it often increases risk because:

  • price pressure is higher (procurement wants discounts)
  • terms are tougher (longer payment cycles, more conditions)
  • admin explodes (reporting, stakeholders, meetings)
  • scope creep is common (“just quickly add this”)
  • power imbalance is real (they know you want the contract)

And if you become dependent on them, you have a bigger issue:

Concentration risk.

One decision by one client can wipe out years of steady progress.

The hidden cost of high-profile projects

High-profile work often brings invisible costs that people do not price properly:

  • extra meetings and stakeholders
  • extra revisions
  • extra reporting
  • higher consequences if anything goes wrong

The bigger the project, the higher the “management tax” on your time.

If you price it like normal work, it will eat your margin alive.

Your foundation matters: small fish are sweet

Your current clients are your foundation.

They usually bring:

  • stable profit
  • repeatability
  • predictable delivery
  • reputation building
  • sanity

Keep smashing these out.

Keep them happy.

Do not neglect the clients who built the business while you chase the shiny new thing.

The “should we take it?” test (before you say yes)

Before you agree to bigger work, slow down and run a proper test.

Ask:

  • Capability: Can we actually deliver what they want, to the standard they expect?
  • Capacity: Who is doing it, and what drops to make room?
  • Quality control: Can we maintain standards under pressure, or are we hoping?
  • Existing clients: Will our current clients feel the slip?
  • Downside risk: If it goes wrong, how ugly is the clean-up (time, money, reputation)?

If the honest answer is “not yet”, that is leadership.

It is better to say “not yet” than to spend 18 months apologising to everyone.

How to grow sustainably without blowing up your base

Most SMEs do this backwards: win big work first, then build systems later.

Critical error. Flip it.

Keep the engine strong, then scale.

Build the basics:

  • procedures
  • checklists
  • training
  • delegation and redundancy
  • quality control steps

Then take stretch work progressively:

  • slightly bigger job
  • tighten process
  • train team
  • improve delivery
  • step up again

That is how you grow without chaos.

The bell curve: what a healthy client base looks like

Most strong SMEs have a bell curve of clients:

  • a strong middle of solid, profitable clients
  • a smaller number of larger outliers at the top end
  • some smaller work underneath that keeps the pipeline healthy

The middle is where stability lives.

The outliers are fine, but you earn them progressively.

What you do not want is a business hinged on one whale.

Because when you hinge the business on “the big one”:

  • you lose pricing power
  • you lose negotiating power
  • you increase the risk that one decision wipes you out

Client diversity protects:

  • cash flow
  • operational stability
  • team morale
  • succession value (a business is more valuable when it is not dependent on one client)

Practical takeaway

If you take nothing else from this:

  • push, pull, stretch — but do it controlled
  • do not chase bright lights at the expense of your current base
  • keep existing clients happy while you build capability
  • diversify to reduce concentration risk
  • build systems first, then scale

And remember:

Small fish are sweet.

Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not take into account your personal circumstances. It is not financial or tax advice. You should seek independent advice from a qualified professional before making decisions about tax, legal or financial planning matters, along with loan structures or entity structure.

Andy Teece

About Atomic Business Advisers

Since 1962, we have helped generations of families and business owners build stronger financial foundations. Atomic Business Advisers continues that legacy today through strategic advisory, practical insights, and strong client education. Our integrity, consistency and care are why people keep coming back — year after year, generation after generation.

- Andy Teece, Director

We don’t just do it for you, we help you understand.

Subscribe to receive our insights, guides and case studies

Understand More. Decide Better.

Let’s Build Something That Lasts

If you're looking for a business adviser who’ll walk alongside you, not just show up at tax time, we’d love to hear your story.

Andy Teece
Andy Teece
Director
See profile
Tony Trochilas
Tony Trochilas
Senior Manager
See profile
Justine Vorich
Justine Vorich
Practice Manager
See profile
Dan Brickwood
Dan Brickwood
Senior Accountant
See profile
Moira Frazer
Moira Frazer
SMSF Manager
See profile
Con Kaplanis
Con Kaplanis
Manager